I want to address the concept of not voting, which many think is an effective way to show discontent with candidate choices or the system in general.
Boy is that a fool’s errand. Similar to snipe hunting.
The classic fool’s errand comes in three varieties: going after something that in reality is non-existent, trying to accomplish a task in an impossible way, or trying to accomplish an impossible task. By any of these criteria, not voting as a form of “protest” qualifies.
Because not voting is a completely inane method for getting your point across…right up there with, say, not paying your credit card bill as a way to protest high interest rates, or not calling a plumber to fix the leak that’s flooding your bathroom as a way to protest high contractor costs… the entity you’re protesting either doesn’t care or doesn’t know the difference, and the only one you’re hurting…is you.
The problem is…our form of government relies on a nifty concept known as majority rule, yet in any given race, the highest voter turn out, particularly from Boomers, is anywhere between 38 & 47%; the 2008 Presidential race had the highest turnout seen since 1968…at 56.8%. Pathetic, isn’t it?
Such abysmal turn-out means two things:
- we have turned into a minority rule form a government: candidates are voted in by a majority, but it’s a majority of a minority of all registered voters…and
- you’re letting folks you don’t know, choose for you…bet you wouldn’t do that with even the most inconsequential things, so why would you do it for something as unequivocally imperative as who leads our country/states/counties/etc.?
Now I’ll break it down one step further, so you can see who is doing the voting for you…:
- Only about 33% of consistent voters know precisely who they want to win regardless of party affiliation, and vote based on a candidate’s actual record of accomplishments…
- but another approximately 33% of those who vote regularly do so along strict party lines regardless of the candidate’s qualifications or leadership capability
- the remaining approximately 33% are undecided, usually until the last few days, and base their vote almost solely on the ever so truthful and fact-filled campaign ads they see on TV, and their vote oftentimes can determine who wins….
- This means that approximately 66% of those who vote are doing so not based on candidates’ track record and true leadership capabilities, but upon pure rhetoric or party affiliation – which is why we have the kinds of rampant unprofessional, unethical, and unlawful behavior on an ever increasing scale that we see regularly on Capitol Hill, and more often now on the State and local levels
- If companies/business owners hired their top managers on the above basis, Enron would be the norm….
- Bottom line – the laws and priorities of the most powerful country on the planet are set by folks who were elected by a minority of voters, 2/3 of whom chose these folks for all the wrong reasons…
This is 100% scarey…. And we’re responsible…not the political parties, not the PAC’s, not big business….us. We can stop wondering why those who get elected to public office are better suited for the National Enquirer than the House/Senate floor.
So, my fellow Boomers, as I said last post, keep doing the same ineffective thing and you’ll keep seeing the same dismal results.
Remember, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing again and again, but expecting a different outcome.
Or, perhaps it’s yet the best definition of a fool’s errand.
What do you think? Let me know.
Incredible points. Solid arguments. Keep up the amazing effort.